Friday, March 02, 2007
60 Minutes
I've put up a new video at YouTube based on the 60 Minutes piece. Hopefully it satisfies whatever rules YouTube is operating by today.
Charles Grassley says
In the video, Grassley also says that we need to turn the FBI upside-down so that, you know, it isn't filled with moles and incompetents. He said this in 2002, and Sibel's corrupt boss, Mike Feghali, is now head of all of the Arab desk.
Charles Grassley says
"Absolutely, she's credible. And the reason I feel she's very credible is because people within the FBI have corroborated a lot of her story."Of course, former FBI counterintelligence agent John Cole said the same thing:
"They (internal FBI) were telling me that Sibel Edmonds was a 100 percent accurate, that management knew that she was correct."
In the video, Grassley also says that we need to turn the FBI upside-down so that, you know, it isn't filled with moles and incompetents. He said this in 2002, and Sibel's corrupt boss, Mike Feghali, is now head of all of the Arab desk.
Comments:
<< Home
You Tube took it down citing CBS's copyright. You can find video of Sibel on CBS's site here
# posted by 
: Monday, March 19, 2007 4:31:00 AM
: Monday, March 19, 2007 4:31:00 AM
She's not credible. If she was she would address some REAL issues with 9/11 such as:
People in the reality-based community should have no problem whatsoever in realizing that the uppermost portion of a skyscraper is not going to be able to "fall" into and THROUGH the remaining vast majority of solid building as quickly, meaning as effortlessly as falling through air without something else (i.e. explosives) reducing said majority of building to such a state of offering no more resistance than air. Can we all agree on that? Sounds pretty straightforward; solid things offer vastly more resistance than air. Anyone who graduated elementary school SHOULD be able to grasp this, and SHOULD be able to therefore grasp that the Twin Towers and WTC # 7 building had to have been controlled demolitions. It is literally COMMON SENSE.
People in the reality-based community should have no problem whatsoever in realizing that the uppermost portion of a skyscraper is not going to be able to "fall" into and THROUGH the remaining vast majority of solid building as quickly, meaning as effortlessly as falling through air without something else (i.e. explosives) reducing said majority of building to such a state of offering no more resistance than air. Can we all agree on that? Sounds pretty straightforward; solid things offer vastly more resistance than air. Anyone who graduated elementary school SHOULD be able to grasp this, and SHOULD be able to therefore grasp that the Twin Towers and WTC # 7 building had to have been controlled demolitions. It is literally COMMON SENSE.
# posted by : Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:11:00 AM
: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:11:00 AM
So does Sibel have no common sense? Really? Come on. She has common sense but she is working for the perpetrators of the 9/11 false flag operation. To anyone who has spent any time or effort looking into the details of 9/11, Sibel has no credibility whatsoever and worse, is obviously working for the murderers.
Post a Comment
# posted by : Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:16:00 AM
: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 11:16:00 AM << Home
