Thursday, May 10, 2007
Who wants to gag Sibel Edmonds? And why?
I have a new post over at my main blog "Who wants to gag Sibel Edmonds? And why?"
Comments:
<< Home
"Who wants to gag Sibel Edmonds and why?"
Who: The real perpetrators of the 9/11 false flag operation.
Why: To lend Sibel (false) credibility so that if they need her to help solidify a limited hangout in the public mind then she will be believed by idiots who haven't made much effort to look into 9/11 or have been looking in the wrong places. Whatever she says if and when she is un-gagged won't be the truth, rest assured. It will be what the perpetrators WANT her to say, to screw over a few scapegoats and let the rest of them go scot free. THAT'S why she hasn't been killed off; it's not that they don't want to make her a martyr, it's so obviously because SHE IS WORKING FOR THEM!! SHE IS PART OF THE COVER-UP!!! HELLO!!!!
Who: The real perpetrators of the 9/11 false flag operation.
Why: To lend Sibel (false) credibility so that if they need her to help solidify a limited hangout in the public mind then she will be believed by idiots who haven't made much effort to look into 9/11 or have been looking in the wrong places. Whatever she says if and when she is un-gagged won't be the truth, rest assured. It will be what the perpetrators WANT her to say, to screw over a few scapegoats and let the rest of them go scot free. THAT'S why she hasn't been killed off; it's not that they don't want to make her a martyr, it's so obviously because SHE IS WORKING FOR THEM!! SHE IS PART OF THE COVER-UP!!! HELLO!!!!
Will Sibel ever talk about this??:
People in the reality-based community should have no problem whatsoever in realizing that the uppermost portion of a skyscraper is not going to be able to "fall" into and THROUGH the remaining vast majority of solid building as quickly, meaning as effortlessly as falling through air without something else (i.e. explosives) reducing said majority of building to such a state of offering no more resistance than air. Can we all agree on that? Sounds pretty straightforward; solid things offer vastly more resistance than air. Anyone who graduated elementary school SHOULD be able to grasp this, and SHOULD be able to therefore grasp that the Twin Towers and WTC # 7 building had to have been controlled demolitions. It is literally COMMON SENSE.
STOP COVERING UP FOR THE REAL MASS MURDERERS SIBEL!!!!
Post a Comment
People in the reality-based community should have no problem whatsoever in realizing that the uppermost portion of a skyscraper is not going to be able to "fall" into and THROUGH the remaining vast majority of solid building as quickly, meaning as effortlessly as falling through air without something else (i.e. explosives) reducing said majority of building to such a state of offering no more resistance than air. Can we all agree on that? Sounds pretty straightforward; solid things offer vastly more resistance than air. Anyone who graduated elementary school SHOULD be able to grasp this, and SHOULD be able to therefore grasp that the Twin Towers and WTC # 7 building had to have been controlled demolitions. It is literally COMMON SENSE.
STOP COVERING UP FOR THE REAL MASS MURDERERS SIBEL!!!!
<< Home